Legal Opinion

Zacharie's Administrator v. Prieur

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1836PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PROBATES FOR THE PARISH AND CITY OF NEW-ORLEANS. ' This case commenced by a rule taken by the plaintiff on D. Prieur and F. W. Lea, commissioners appointed by the parties litigant, and on P. Landreaux, recorder of mortgagés, to show cause why certain mortgages should not be erased and cancelled.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PROBATES FOR THE PARISH AND CITY OF NEW-ORLEANS. ' This case commenced by a rule taken by the plaintiff on D. Prieur and F. W. Lea, commissioners appointed by the parties litigant, and on P. Landreaux, recorder of mortgagés, to show cause why certain mortgages should not be erased and cancelled. The facts show, that in 1833 certain property in front of c¡ty 0f New-Orleans, being in suit and pending on appeal, between the corporation of New-Orleans and the government tj_ie United States, was by agreement between the parties litigant, sanctioned by a decree of the…

1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.

The administrator of the estate of J. M. Zacharie took a rule on Prieur and Lea, commissioners appointed by the District Court of the United States to sell certain property in the city of New-Orleans, in controversy between the city and the United States,, together with the recorder of mortgages, to show cause w7hy certain mortgages retained on the property to secure the payment of the price to the party which might finally prevail in that suit, should not be cancelled, so far as they affected the lots purchased by the deceased, and' which, had been recently sold by the administrator, in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. French v. PrieurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843
  2. Leverich v. PrieurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
  3. Succession of Jessen v. Calcasieu Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API