Nolte v. Security Insurance

I. Plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict was upon numerous grounds.' Defendant’s contention is that none of them was good. Without considering the others, we think two of them were sound, and to them we limit our discussion. The defense is founded on the failure of the assured to pay a premium note. Plaintiff takes the position that, while a purported copy of the note was set out in the policy, it was not a true copy. The note as it was actually executed was for $128, and unthorized the insertion of the number of the policy, which was done. The copy set forth in the policy was for $100,…