Hickman v. Trust of Heath, House & Boyles
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Steele Hays, Justice.
Appellants brought this suit in equity to have certain writings declared to be an express trust for their benefit. The trial court held the evidence was insufficient to establish that the plaintiffs were designated beneficiaries and they appeal from that order. We affirm the chancellor.
Heath & Scarbrough Construction' Company, Inc., owed $19,171.08 to each of its three stockholders, James Heath, J.O. House and Mason Boyles. Each stockholder held a promissory note from the corporation.
On November 6, 1973, at a special meeting of the directors of Heath & Scarbrough, the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Friar v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Betts v. BettsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Edwards v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Thompson v. FischerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Burnett v. First Commercial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.