Legal Opinion

State v. Henning

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 30, 2007No. 98,118, 98,119PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, J.:

This is the State’s appeal from the district court’s suppression of evidence seized during the search of a vehicle incident to a lawful arrest on July 6, 2006.

The first impression issue in Kansas in this appeal involves the interpretation of the 2006 amendment in K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 22-2501(c) to allow law enforcement officers making a lawful arrest to reasonably search the person arrested and the area within such person’s immediate presence for the purpose of discovering the fruits, instrumentalities, or evidence of a crime rather than the crime.

The facts in this case are not…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. In re SkolnickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. State v. AckwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DanielSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. State v. KarsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  3. State v. DanielSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. State v. DanielSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API