Legal Opinion

Kansas Pacific Ry. Co. v. Cranmer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1879PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court of Arapahoe County. Action on the case. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtThatcher, C. J.

This is a suit brought by the appellee for the purpose of recovering damages from the appellant by reason of his wagon being demolished and his horses killed by being run over by an engine of the appellant, the appellee being at the time in what is called the yard of the company for the purpose of unloading coal from certain cars. There is evidence tending to show that appellee was at the time of the accident in the yard of the railway company, between the tracks at a place not designated for the purpose of standing room, or driving way for the teams, sufficient facilities being afforded for…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Moffatt v. TenneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. CrismanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  4. Denver & Berkeley Park Rapid Transit Co. v. DwyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  5. Denver City Tramway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API