United States ex rel. Bland v. Nenna
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
We affirm in open court, for the reasons stated in Judge Frankel’s opinion, 282 F.Supp. 754 (S.D.N.Y.1968), the denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We reject the contention made by petitioner, who is awaiting trial, in the state court on charges of robbery, grand larceny, assault and possession of a loaded pistol, that he has been placed in double jeopardy in violation of his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights, the state court having declared a mistrial in a prior trial on the same charges after a jury was impaneled, but before the introduction of any evidence, because…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States ex rel. Bland v. NennaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- James Mizell v. The Attorney General of the State of New York and Ano.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Mizell v. Attorney General of State of NYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- United States Ex Rel. Roy Bland v. Hon. Albert Nenna, as Warden, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968