Legal Opinion

McFaddin v. Bland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 17, 1928No. 12494PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Acting Justice J. Wm. Thurmond.

This action was commenced July 25, 1924, by T. H. Mc-Faddin and Mary B. McFaddin against R. J. Bland, R. O. Purdy, S. Oliver O’Bryan, and E. S. Carson, alleging that a mortgage given by the plaintiffs to R. J. Bland, and by him assigned to L. S. Carson, had been fully paid and satisfied, and that the defendants failed and refused to cancel the same of record. The action prayed for judgment against the defendants for the penalties provided by the statutes for failure and refusal to enter satisfaction on the records of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Land Mortgage Co. v. GillamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  2. Bates v. American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  3. Mayfield v. British & American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  4. Beck v. Northwestern R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  5. Weathers v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City Lumber Co. v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. Russell Willis, Inc. v. PageSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  3. Hahn v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. Ex Parte DortSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. Citizens Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Verex Assurance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API