Legal Opinion
Wirhowski v. Hudson Armored Car & Courier Service, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 20, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Barone, J.), dated April 5, 1994, as, denied the defendants’ motion to amend their answer and for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the defendants’ motion for leave to amend their answer and for summary judgment is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The injured plaintiff Margaret Wirhowski alleges that, on March 5, 1993, she…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mangini v. McClurgNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- McCaskey, Davies & Associates, Inc. v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- DeQuatro v. Zhen Yu LiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- Faracy v. McGraw Edison Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Galatioto v. HanesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Taylor v. Village of IlionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Brock v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003