State ex rel. v. Stedman

I concur with the majority and dissenting opinion as to the legal insufficiency of the affidavits for disqualification as they relate to the statements of the trial judge concerning the Grand Jury Indictments.

I specially concur in the majority opinion for the following additional reasons.

Rule 1.230, “CrPR”, 33 F.S.A., is pertinent in this case and is set forth, in material part, in the dissenting opinion.

The rule contains substantially the same requirements as § 911.01 (3) — (4) and § 38.-10, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The procedural requirements of the rule differ from those of the statutes, but the…