Legal Opinion

Ada J. Vant and Walter J. Vant v. The Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 9, 1958No. 12408_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

On March 23, 1920, the late George H. Vant amendéd the settlement provision of his application to the defendant for insurance in the amount of $25,000 on his life. In accordance with that amendment, policies were issued to provide in relevant part that on the death of the insured, the defendant would hold the proceeds, pay the widow interest at 3% per year for life, and upon her death pay the son interest at the same rate until January 1, 1943, and then pay the son thé entire amount of the proceeds. The application directed that “the right of the withdrawal is to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of NiresNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Elliott v. Travelers InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosen v. RosenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Ada J. Vant and Walter J. Vant v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  3. Gilbert Minors, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API