Legal Opinion

Gust v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1932No. 30,675PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action on an insurance policy. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

Appellee is a coal miner. In 1929 he was employed by the Cowan Coal Company. While so employed he received an injury which resulted in the loss of the sight of one eye. He brought an action before the commissioner of workmen’s compensation for the state and was awarded compensation. This award was appealed to the district court and sustained. Two days after the award was sustained Hal C. Cowan, as a sole trader and doing business as the Cowan Coal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burton v. LarkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  2. Ross v. Haddam State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. Standard Acc. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  2. Lawrence Nat. Bank v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. Scott v. Kansas Western Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. Dollar v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Lawrence Nat. Bank v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API