Legal Opinion

Automation Source Corp. v. Korea Exchange Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 2, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered April 8, 1997, which, in an action by plaintiff beneficiary against defendant bank for failure to pay on a letter of credit, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It is well established that New York requires strict compliance with the terms of a letter of credit (United Commodities-Greece v Fidelity Intl. Bank, 64 NY2d 449, 455). Thus, in determining whether to pay a letter of credit, the bank may, and must, look solely at the letter and the documentation the beneficiary presents…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United Commodities-Greece v. Fidelity International BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Belgium, S.A. v. Phosphate Chemicals Export Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Hellenic Republic v. Standard Chartered BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blonder & Co. v. Citibank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Brunswick County v. The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Limited, Formerly Known as the Bank of Tokyo, Limited, New York AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  3. Zalmen Reiss & Associates Inc. v. European American BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API