Legal Opinion

The People v. Balalas

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1929No. 19128. Judgment reversedPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dietz

Plaintiff in error was convicted by the judgment of the municipal court of Chicago for the violation of paragraph 164 of the Criminal Code. (Cahill’s Stat. 1921.) The prosecution was by information, to which a plea of not guilty was entered. A jury trial was waived and the hearing was before the court. Motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment were made and overruled and plaintiff in error was sentenced to ninety days’ imprisonment in the house of correction and to pay a fine of $200 and the costs of prosecution. This conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Court and the case is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The People v. MintoIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People v. TaitIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. OgunsolaIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. BillingsleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  3. People v. CundiffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. People v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. People v. SamplesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API