Legal Opinion

Woody v. . Privett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 10, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

There is no finding of a meritorious defense, hence the order vacating the judgment will be set aside and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the rights of the parties. Jones v. Swepson, 94 N. C., 699; Gaylord, v. Berry, 169 N. C., 733, 86 S. E., 623.

A party who seeks to be relieved from a judgment on the ground of excusable neglect or irregularity must show merit, otherwise the court would be 'engaged in the vain procedure of setting aside a judgment, when, if there be no defense, it would be its duty to enter the same judgment again on motion' of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duffer v. . BrunsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Gaylord v. . BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Crumpler v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Taylor v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Bryan v. . MoringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cayton v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API