Legal Opinion

Quezada-Barrera v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 2009No. A08A1869PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Francisco Quezada-Barrera appeals from his conviction for possessing cocaine with the intent to distribute. In his only enumeration of error, Quezada-Barrera asserts insufficient evidence supports his conviction because the State failed to establish venue within Gwinnett County. We agree and must therefore reverse his conviction.

The evidence relating to venue in this case includes: the street address where the crime took place; the arresting officer’s employment with the Gwinnett County Police Department; and the arresting officer’s testimony that “we have had several…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Interest of B. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. McKinney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  3. In the Interest of G. Q.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API