Legal Opinion

Pensacola Construction Co. v. McNamara

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1989No. CA 88 1205PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LeBLANC, Judge.

This is an appeal by the Department of Revenue and Taxation (Department) from a district court judgment which reversed a Board of Tax Appeals decision upholding a use tax assessment on certain transportation expenses incurred by Pensacola Construction Company. The Department has appealed.1

On February 28, 1984, Pensacola entered into a contract with the U.S. Corps of Engineers to realign certain sections of the Red River. In conjunction therewith, it purchased a large quantity of stone from Reed Crushed Stone Company, Inc. of Gilberts-ville, Kentucky. The stone was then…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Electronic Industries Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company v. CocrehamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  3. Mouton v. Klatex, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Mouton v. Klatex, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  5. Dow Chemical Company v. TraigleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pensacola Const. Co. v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Pensacola Construction Co. v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  3. Duncan Oil, Inc. v. Calcasieu Parish Sch. Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Duncan Oil, Inc. v. Calcasieu Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API