Pensacola Construction Co. v. McNamara
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LeBLANC, Judge.
This is an appeal by the Department of Revenue and Taxation (Department) from a district court judgment which reversed a Board of Tax Appeals decision upholding a use tax assessment on certain transportation expenses incurred by Pensacola Construction Company. The Department has appealed.1
On February 28, 1984, Pensacola entered into a contract with the U.S. Corps of Engineers to realign certain sections of the Red River. In conjunction therewith, it purchased a large quantity of stone from Reed Crushed Stone Company, Inc. of Gilberts-ville, Kentucky. The stone was then…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Electronic Industries Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chicago Bridge & Iron Company v. CocrehamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Mouton v. Klatex, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Mouton v. Klatex, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Dow Chemical Company v. TraigleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pensacola Const. Co. v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Pensacola Construction Co. v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Duncan Oil, Inc. v. Calcasieu Parish Sch. Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Duncan Oil, Inc. v. Calcasieu Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018