Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Nager

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 12, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

In this proceeding to construe the testator ’s will a hearing was held at the request of parties to permit proof as to the testamentary intention expressed in subdivision (b) of article Fourth of the will, which reads as follows: “ (b) Upon the death of my said wife, or if she shall not survive me, then upon my death, my trustees shall pay over the principal of the trust, or my residuary estate, as the case may be to my brother dr. irving nager, should he survive my wife and myself absolutely and forever. Should my brother dr. irving nager predecease my wife and me then my…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scott v. . GuernseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Phillips v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Roe v. . VingutNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. In Re the Probate of the Will of SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. In Re the Estate of HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of CroftWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In re the Estate of GrausteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971
  3. In re the Estate of HowardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965
  4. In re the Estate of TurnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API