McCann v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 5, Oct. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from judgment of tlie Superior Court, April T., 1900, No. 119, affirming judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1899, No. 271, affirming judgment of alderman in case of' Owen McCann, trading as McCann & Company v. Commonwealth to use of Levi Wells, Dairy and Food Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Appeal from Superior Court: 14 Pa.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 5, Oct. T., 1901, by plaintiff, from judgment of tlie Superior Court, April T., 1900, No. 119, affirming judgment of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1899, No. 271, affirming judgment of alderman in case of' Owen McCann, trading as McCann & Company v. Commonwealth to use of Levi Wells, Dairy and Food Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Appeal from Superior Court: 14 Pa. Superior Ct. 221. In the Superior Court, Rige, P. J., filed the following' opinion : ~ The appellant was adjudged guilty, and a judgment was entered against him by an alderman in a suit for a…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The opinion of Judge Rice filed July 26, 1900, is in our view of the case, a complete and satisfactory answer to the plaintiff’s contention that the act of assembly of May 5, 1899, P. L. 241, is in conflict with article 1, section 1, of the constitution of the state of Pennsylvania, and section 1 of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SchollenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Commonwealth v. MelletSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Bennett v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Best Foods, Inc. v. WelchDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1929
- State v. Hammond Packing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908