Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Utah Board of State Lands

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1968No. 11219PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUCKETT, Justice.

The plaintiffs commenced this action to enjoin the defendants from issuing to a third party an oil and gas lease covering lands which were already subject to a lease running in favor of the plaintiffs and covering the oil contained in the bituminous sands found on said lands. We are here concerned chiefly with the issue as to whether or not the oil recoverable under the bituminous sand lease is the same mineral as that recoverable under an oil and gas lease.

Evidence was introduced in the court below as to the nature of the oil which could be taken from bituminous sands in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kirkman v. BirdUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Continental Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. John H. Seely & Sons Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Utah Resources International, Inc. v. Utah Board of State LandsUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Utah Resources International, Inc. v. Utah Board of State LandsUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Utah Resources International, Inc. v. Utah Board of State LandsUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Utah Resources International, Inc. v. Utah Board of State LandsUtah Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API