Legal Opinion
Schroeder v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 18, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, in this action for breach of an insurance contract, have moved for complete or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Jurisdiction rests on diversity of citizenship and the allegation in the complaint that plaintiffs are entitled to a recovery of more than $10,000, viz., $101,500. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1).
This $101,500 figure is based upon the following claims of damage: $1,500 compensatory damages (for litigation expenses which allegedly should have been borne by defendant pursuant to the terms…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Anne Arnold and Edward E. Arnold v. Tex Troccoli, Also Known as "Tex Barton,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Faulk v. Aware, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Lloyd Donald Tullos v. Norris I. CorleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Deming v. Buckley's Art GalleryDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1961
3Cited by8 opinions
- H. Keith Zahn v. International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Mariana Deutsch and Abraham Deutsch v. Hewes Street Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Alsip Homebuilders, Inc. v. ShustaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Schwartz v. Victory Container Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Dance v. U.S. International MotorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.