Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Haun

Cuyahoga County Probate Court

Decided December 14, 1971No. 773477PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalty, J.

Exclusive jurisdiction of adoption proceedings is vested in the probate courts of the state. R. C. 3107.02; In re Biddle, 168 Ohio St. 206.

This proceeding was commenced on September 3, 1971, by the filing of a petition by Charles Haun and his wife (petitioners) seeking a decree of adoption of Julie (sometimes called Sheila) an infant of three years.

The petition has been opposed by Children’s Services, a community supported child welfare agency in Cleveland certified by the state of Ohio pursuant to E. C. 5103.03, and a “certified organization” as that term is used in-B. C, 3107. Children’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In Re AdoptionOhio Court of Appeals · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adoption of TachickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State ex rel. Portage County Welfare Dept. v. SummersOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Stines v. VaughnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. State ex rel. Department of Institutions, Social & Rehabilitative Services v. GriffisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF INST., SOC. & REHAB. SERV. v. GriffisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API