Legal Opinion

Flanagan v. Womack

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1880No. Case No. 813PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from Gregg. Tried below before the Hon. John 0. Bobertson.

1Opinion of the Court

Bonner, Associate Justice.

This is a civil action for damages, actual and exemplary, brought by appellant Flanagan against appellees Womack and Perry, for an alleged assault and battery committed by them upon him. In the opinion of the presiding judge, there not being sufficient testimony against Perry, the jury were instructed to return a verdict for him. There was a verdict and judgment of one dollar actual damages against defendant Womack.

*47Among other defenses, Womack pleaded that on indictment for the same offense he had been convicted and a fine of $100, besides costs of suit, adjudged…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burrell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Hays v. Houston G. N. R. R. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Pearson v. FlanaganTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Graham v. RoderTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Cole v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1851

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. FullerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Tonia L. Cush-Crawford, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Adchem Corp., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. Lampert v. Judge & Dolph Drug Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. Girard v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1894

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API