Legal Opinion
Kotrous v. Goss-Jewett Co. of Northern California, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 16, 2008No. 06-15162, 06-16019PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
We are required to consider the continued viability of Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp., 118 F.3d 1298 (9th Cir.1997), in light of the Supreme Court’s most recent precedent addressing the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675 (“CERCLA”). Sections 107 and 113(f) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607 and 9613, “allow private parties to recover expenses associated with cleaning up contaminated sites.” United States v. Atl. Research Corp., — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2331, 2333, 168 L.Ed.2d 28 (2007). In Atlantic Research, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morrison Enterprises, LLC v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- City of Emeryville v. The Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Kotrous v. GOSS-JEWETT CO. OF NORTHERN CAL.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008