Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Smith v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Ry. Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1917Published

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. C. II. Mayer, Judge.

1Concurrence

SEPARATE CONCURRING OPINION.

ELLISON, P. J.

If it be granted that the trial court, in passing on the motion for new trial had authority to look to the entire evidence in the case, that for defendant as well as that for plaintiff, in order to determine whether punitive damages were excessive, that does not touch the real question involved. The real question is whether the court or the jury measure punitive damages. Of course, if there is no substantial evidence to justify such damages, the court can so declare as a matter of law. And if there is evidence to sustain punitive damages, yet they are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API