Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 22, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error was convicted of assault, with intent to commit manslaughter.

On writ of error his sole contention is that the Court erred in denying his motion for continuance. The motion, was as follows:

“Comes now IT. O. Brown, Attorney for the Defendant, Lacy Moore, and moves this Honorable Court for a continuance in this cause and to be permitted to withdraw plea of not guilty heretofore entered in this cause; and, for grounds for said motion, says:
“1. That counsel for defendant was employed just two minutes before the convening of the morning session of Court and the day set for trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ballard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  2. Lowe v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API