Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Buckey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1985No. Docket Nos. 73929, 74232. (Calendar Nos. 6, 7)Published

1DissentCavanagh, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s determination that a prosecutor may comment on a defendant’s opportunity to fabricate testimony because of his presence at trial. I am *19persuaded that such prosecutorial comments impermissibly infringe on a defendant’s constitutional and statutory right to be present at trial, as well as his rights to testify and assist in his defense. See People v Fredericks, 125 Mich App 114, 119-120; 335 NW2d 919 (1983).

The majority concedes it would be error for a prosecutor to link a defendant’s presence or absence at trial with his ultimate guilt or innocence,…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API