Legal Opinion
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Russell-Esposito
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 30, 2010PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J), dated October 15, 2008, which denied her motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, but which was, in actuality, one for leave to reargue her motion, inter alia, to enjoin the plaintiff from evicting her, which had been determined in an order dated May 9, 2008.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly treated the defendant’s motion as one for leave to reargue, since the mortgagor failed to offer any new…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jones v. Amiee Lynn AccessoriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Peralta v. All Weather Tire Sales & Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by6 opinions
- Basile v. WiggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. MichalczykAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Petrosillo v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Basile v. WiggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Law Offs. of James Briscoe W., PLLC v. MerinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.