Legal Opinion

Hoppe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1932No. 15324Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

In the motion for rehearing, counsel for the appellant reiterates the contention made on the original hearing, namely, that the affidavit for the search warrant was insufficient to warrant the search and the reception of the evidence of the result of the search. Our review of the matter leaves us of the opinion that the conclusion reached and stated in the original opinion reflects the proper disposition of the points in question.

In the amended motion for new trial are averments claiming that the jury in its deliberations made remarks indicating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crouchette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Sykes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Stapler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Tindale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API