Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 28, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

The law governing this case is stated in Rogers v. Clough, 76 N. H. 272, 274. “If it were not for this order, the defendants’ recovery would be limited to their taxable costs. On the other hand, procuring the injunction bound the plaintiffs to comply with the conditions on which it was issued. Consequently the order limits both the amount the defendants can recover and the items of expense which are chargeable to the plaintiffs. In other words, the amount the defendants can recover in excess of their taxable costs and the items which compose it both depend on the terms of the order.”

It being…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Manchester & Lawrence RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  2. Rogers v. CloughSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  3. Solomon v. ChesleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Housley v. TobinWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
  2. New England Fiber Co. v. Bath Fiber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  3. Real Estate Advisors, Inc. v. Whittier Lifts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API