Legal Opinion

Congdon v. Knapp

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1920No. 21,706PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff commenced this action to compel the state auditor to audit certain vouchers and to draw warrants therefor on the treasurer for $3,666.64, the balance of the salary of the plaintiff as hotel commissioner of the state of Kansas. The plaintiff was appointed to that office on the 19th day of Juné, 1915. He qualified under that appointment and continued to act thereunder until November 1, 1917. On May 1, 1914, he had been appointed assistant chief food and drug inspector and acted under that appointment until February 1, 1917,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Abry v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. Dyche v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Unified School District No. 501 v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Moore v. WesleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API