Legal Opinion

Nantico v. Matuszak

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1948No. Docket No. 13, Calendar No. 44,022PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This is a suit by an employee against his employers to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of a fall on a basement stairway on the defendants’ premises. The case was tried by jury, plaintiff had verdict for $5,000 and from the judgment entered on the verdict the defendants appeal. The defendants make no claim they had less than eight employees, did not carry workmen’s compensation insurance, and concede that they were barred from interposing the defense of contributory negligence (unless wilful), negligence of a fellow employee, and assumed risk. "Workmen’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Langworthy v. Township of GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Madalinski v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Beecher v. GalvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Finch v. W. R. Roach Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Wuerth v. StiversMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richards v. Birmingham School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Lámar v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Bean v. Piedmont Interstate Fair Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  4. John Bean v. Piedmont Interstate Fair Association, in the Matter of John Bean v. Piedmont Interstate Fair Association, and Piedmont Interstate Fair Association, Third Party v. Fireworks Corporation of America, a Corporation, Jack Kochman and Jack Kochman, Inc., a Corporation, Third Parties C.A. 1268Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  5. Richards v. Birmingham School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API