Marshall v. Marshall

The issue presented is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to order restitution for the husband on remand, where this court previously determined that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over the husband to determine issues concerning support and equitable distribution. We find the trial court has jurisdiction to order restitution in its discretion, and we reverse.

*359These parties came before us previously in Marshall v. Marshall, 988 So.2d 644 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), where this court reversed the trial,court’s denial of the husband’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal…