Kem v. Johnson
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
This proceeding is one initiated by O. T. Kem to establish a preferential claim to assets of the Columbus State Bank, insol*334vent. The proceeding had its inception before the liquidating officer, the superintendent of banks, who placed the claim in class 4, section 134, Chapter 89, Laws of 1927, thereby allowing it as a general claim, but denying the preference claimed. Kem appealed to the district court, where the action of the superintendent of banks was affirmed. From the action of the district court this appeal was taken.
While several specifications of error are made, they raise but one…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ferguson v. StandleyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Bassett v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Cohen v. First National Bank of NogalesArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Gaines v. First State Bank of BellevueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.