Legal Opinion

Franklin v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 26, 1929No. 19615PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Paragraph 1 of section 2 of article 1 of the constitution of Georgia (Civil Code of 1910, § 6388) declares: “Private property shall not bo *321taken or damaged for public purposes without just and adequate compensation being first paid.” Section 5506 of the Civil Code says: "For ('very right there shall be a remedy, and every court having jurisdiction of the one may, if necessary, frame the other.” Section 3653 provides that “for every injury done by another to person or property, the law gives a right to recover, and a remedy to enforce it.” It is not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Floyd CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. City of Atlanta v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  3. Hobart v. Milwaukee City RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Campbell v. Metropolitan Street RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. Roughton v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Florida State Hospital for the Insane v. Durham Iron Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Felton v. State Highway BoardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. City of Atlanta v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  4. City of Atlanta v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  5. City of Atlanta v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API