Legal Opinion

Wathen's v. Chamberlin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 4, 1839PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Chancery. From the Circuit Court for Hardin County.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Marshall

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The case of Tribble vs. Taul, 7 Mon. 455, establishes the doctrine that, the court of equity will not take jurisdiction to set off demands purely legal, unless upon one of the following grounds: 1. that the demands axe connected, as that one is the consideration of the other; or, 2. that there has been an agreement to set them off against each other; or 3. that they have been completely liquidated at law; or 4. that there is some obstacle to the proceeding at law for coercing the demand sought to be set off — as nonresidence, insolvency or the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tuscumbia, Courtland & Decatur Rail Road v. RhodesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  2. Carroll v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  3. Becker v. NorthwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Wray's Adm'rs v. FurnissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  5. Graham v. TankersleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API