Legal Opinion

Harnish v. Herald-Mail Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 22, 1972No. [No. 81, September Term, 1971.]Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

264 Md. 326 (1972)

286 A.2d 146

HARNISH ET UX.

v.

HERALD-MAIL CO., INC. ET AL.

[No. 81, September Term, 1971.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 21, 1972.

Motion for modification and reargument filed February 22, 1972.

Denied March 6, 1972.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

Justin N. Scharf for appellants.

John H. Urner and David W. Byron, with whom were Byron, Moylan & Urner on the brief, for appellees.

2Opinion of the Court · HammondHammond, C.J.

BARNES and FINAN, JJ., dissent and BARNES, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which FINAN, J., concurs at page 338 infra.

Ri…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API