Munoz v. PHH Mortgage Corp.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 | EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on 4 | behalf of all others similarly situated, 5 fetal, No. 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM 6 7 Plaintiffs, ORDER RESPECTING 8 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 9 Vv. IN LIMINE #6 10 11 |PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 12 |etal., 13 14 Defendants. 15 Defendants’ sixth motion in limine (ECF 474) seeks to preclude certain 16 | expert testimony Plaintiffs intend to offer at trial that Defendants contend ei- 17 | ther fails to meet Federal Rule of Evidence 702’s standards for “being grounded 18 |in reliable facts and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Siring v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education ex rel. Eastern Oregon UniversityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Dallas County v. MERSCORP, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
- Jeffrey Hunter Mendler, Dba Jeffrey Hunter v. Winterland Production, Ltd., a California Corporation San Diego Yacht Club, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Shandor v. Wells National Service Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.