Legal Opinion

Munoz v. PHH Mortgage Corp.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 14, 2022No. 1:08-cv-00759Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 | EFRAIN MUNOZ, individually and on 4 | behalf of all others similarly situated, 5 fetal, No. 1:08-cv-00759-MMB-BAM 6 7 Plaintiffs, ORDER RESPECTING 8 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 9 Vv. IN LIMINE #6 10 11 |PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 12 |etal., 13 14 Defendants. 15 Defendants’ sixth motion in limine (ECF 474) seeks to preclude certain 16 | expert testimony Plaintiffs intend to offer at trial that Defendants contend ei- 17 | ther fails to meet Federal Rule of Evidence 702’s standards for “being grounded 18 |in reliable facts and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Siring v. Oregon State Board of Higher Education ex rel. Eastern Oregon UniversityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  3. Dallas County v. MERSCORP, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
  4. Jeffrey Hunter Mendler, Dba Jeffrey Hunter v. Winterland Production, Ltd., a California Corporation San Diego Yacht Club, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Shandor v. Wells National Service Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API