Legal Opinion

Claim of Gallagher v. Carol Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 25, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcNamee, J.

The claimant was injured in his employment, filed a claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, and then elected under the statute to bring an action against a third party to recover on the ground of negligence. The action came to trial before the Supreme Court and a jury, and a verdict *33in the sum of $5,000 was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, the claimant here. Upon the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, the trial judge made an order granting the motion, on the ground that the verdict was excessive, unless the plaintiff would stipulate to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Roth v. Harlem Funeral Car CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Claim of Roth v. Harlem Funeral Car Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Claim of Gilman v. BardenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API