Legal Opinion

Grand Rapids Hydraulic Co. v. American Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

This is an action upon a fire insurance policy upon plaintiff’s “engines, boilers, pumps, and connections, including smokestack, fire fronts, breeching, and tools, all while contained in frame pump house.” It is a Michigan standard policy, and contains the following provisions:

“This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void if * * * the hazard be increased by any means within the control or knowledge of the insured; * * * or if illuminating gas or vapor be generated in the described building (or adjacent thereto) for use therein; or…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Felsenthal v. HawksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API