Legal Opinion

Braye v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 21, 1995No. 4—95—0499PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garman

Third-party defendant All Tri-R, Inc. (All Tri-R), brings this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (155 111. 2d R. 308) following the decision in the circuit court of Macon County to allow Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) to amend its third-party complaint. We are called upon to consider the following question certified by the circuit court:

"Whether the liability cap in third[-]party actions provided to an employer who pays an injured employee’s worker[s’] compensation benefits may be waived by contract, and if so, whether a contract which states:

'If [All Tri-R’s] work…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Doyle v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kotecki v. Cyclops Welding Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Geise v. Phoenix Co. of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Dixon v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Braye v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Liccardi v. Stolt Terminals, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Liccardi v. Stolt Terminals (Chicago), Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Liccardi v. Stolt Terminals (Chicago), Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Braye v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API