Legal Opinion

Phelps v. State Public Defender

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided November 24, 2010No. 10-0374PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVaitheswaran, J.

We must decide whether the district court erred in approving claims for payment of legal fees and expenses from the indigent defense fund.

J. Background Facts and Proceedings

The state appellate defender withdrew from its appellate representation of an indigent criminal defendant, based on a conflict of interest. The district court appointed attorney Richard E.H. Phelps II to represent the defendant on appeal. At the time of his appointment, Phelps had a “Renewal of Legal Services Contract — Indigent Defense Casework,” with the state public defender, the entity statutorily authorized to process…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. G. Brian Weiler v. State Public DefenderCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
  2. Julia Ofenbakh v. State Public DefenderCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API