Legal Opinion

United States v. Bernard

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 18, 1926No. 2570PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

The merchandise involved in this appeal consists of natural ruscus leaves and natural wheat stems and heads. It was assessed for duty by the collector at 60 per centum ad valorem under the following provisions of paragraph 1419 of the Tariff Act of 1922:

Par. 1419. * * * natural leaves, plants, shrubs, herbs, trees, and parts thereof, chemically treated, colored, dyed or painted, not specially provided for, 60 per centum ad valorem; * * *.

*445The importers protested the collector’s classification, claiming that the imported merchandise was free of duty under paragraph 1582 of the Tariff Act of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Basket Importing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. PostCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. United States v. Rice Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. Bayersdorfer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. United States v. BayersdorferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Joleo Impex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Adolphe Hurst & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. United States v. Loffredo Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API