Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 2, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries he allegedly sustained in an automobile accident on June 11, 2005. The action was commenced upon the filing of the summons and complaint in Civil Court on August 24, 2007 (see CCA 400 [1]). Defendant Perdomo M. Rodriguez was served with a copy of the summons and complaint on December 13, 2007, when a copy of these papers was left with defendant Rodriguez’s wife, followed the next day by a mailing of these papers to Perdomo M. Rodriguez at his actual…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Discover Bank v. EschwegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Malik v. NoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Sturino v. Nino Tripicchio & Son LandscapingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Rosato v. RicciardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Montefiore Medical Center v. Auto One InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rodriguez v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Rodriguez v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012