Legal Opinion

Tackle Eligible Inc v. Scottsdale Insurance Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 6, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00530Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 TACKLE ELIGIBLE, INC., CASE NO. C22-0530-LK 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 v. STAY 13 SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Tackle Eligible, Inc’s motion to stay this case 17 pending a decision from the Washington State Supreme Court in Hill & Stout PLLC v. Mutual of 18 Enumclaw Ins. Co., No. 100211-4 (Wash.), which, like this case, involves potentially insured 19 losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Dkt. No. 21. For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Seattle Tunnel Partners, Et Ano., Pet V. Great Lakes Reinsurance (uk) Plc, RespsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API