Legal Opinion

Champlin Refining Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 4, 1938No. 5668PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHT, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff for the recovery of alleged excessive excise taxes paid under protest upon the sale of gasoline. The facts are stipulated.

From January 1, 1932, to April 8, 1933, the plaintiff reported to the Oklahoma Tax Commission, gasoline consumed, sold, taken from storage, or used, as follows:

Total gallons reported ..................... 10,473,979

Less 3% thereof.............................. 314,218

Net 97% tax basis........................... 10,159,761

Less: Gasoline used for agricultural purposes ...........2,126,212

Sales to United States…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. FiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Petri v. F. E. Creelman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Sweet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  4. Branch v. Oklahoma County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allgood v. AllgoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Isenhower v. IsenhowerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Champlin Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API