Warren v. Compton
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MATHERNE, Judge.
Based upon the provisions of T.C.A. § 31-105, the plaintiff Marie Krantz Warren, the widow of Oliver Carr Warren, sues to set aside two transfers of personalty as having been made by the husband with the intent to defeat her of her distributive or elective share in his estate. The statute provides as follows:
31-105. Fraudulent conveyance to defeat share voidable. — Any conveyances made fraudulently to children or others, with an intent to defeat the surviving spouse of his distributive or elective share, is voidable at the election of the surviving spouse. [Acts 1976 (Adj.S.),…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sherrill v. MallicoteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1967
- Reynolds v. VanceTennessee Supreme Court · 1870
- Fillmore v. FillmoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
- Rowland v. RowlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by7 opinions
- CAO Holdings, Inc. v. TrostTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- In re Estate of ParsleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Finley v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- In Re: Estate of Bernie RiggsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Jewell Maness v. Estate of Acie ManessCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.