Legal Opinion

State v. Tate

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 24, 1986Published

1Opinion of the Court

102 N.J. 64 (1986)

505 A.2d 941

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

MICHAEL TATE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 23, 1985.

Decided February 24, 1986.

Paul F. Chaiet, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (John A. Kaye, Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney; James W. Kennedy, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

Robert I. Ansell argued the cause for respondent (Anschelewitz, Barr & Ansell, attorneys).

Linda L. Yoder, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney…

Also in this document: Dissent · Handler; Dissent · Garibaldi.

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. Evers v. DollingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Renz v. Penn Central Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API