Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. v. Islamic Republic of Iran
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
This action involves a motion by defendant Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1), (4), and (6) to vacate a default judgment entered against it for a violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (2006). Because the Court finds that defendant Iran has not waived sovereign immunity, it will grant its motion to vacate the default judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4) [Dkt. # 28] and dismiss the action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. 1
I. BACKGROUND
On September 29, 2006, plaintiffs Bell…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Chey v. Orbitz Worldwide, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013