Legal Opinion

Bakst v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 20, 1993No. 92-2248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, Alvin Bakst, appeals from a final summary judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., as receiver of First American Bank and Trust [FDIC]. The affidavit of indebtedness failed to disprove the affirmative defenses raised by the defendant and FDIC failed to demonstrate the legal insufficiency of the defenses. See Campagna v. Dicus, 606 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Therefore, FDIC is not entitled to a summary judgment. Johnson & Kirby, Inc. v. Citizens Nat’l Bank of Fort Lauderdale, 338 So.2d 905 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Underwriters Ins. Co. v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holl v. TalcottSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Johnson & Kirby, Inc. v. Citizens Nat. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Underwriters Insurance Co. v. SisungDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Campagna v. DicusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. TLZ Properties v. Kilburn-Young Asset Management Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. ClarkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Zabler v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API