Legal Opinion

SMITH Et Al. v. DiFRANCESCO

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 19, 2017No. A17A0404PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Presiding Judge.

In this appeal, we must determine whether the trial court properly found that the defendant doctor was entitled to summary judgment on the plaintiff doctor’s claim of defamation per se based on the defendant’s transmission of a letter to patients in which the defendant called into question the plaintiff’s ability to practice medicine. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand the case for further proceedings.

“On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we review the evidence de novo to determine whether the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mathis v. CannonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Cottrell v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  3. Cohen v. HartlageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Bellemeade, LLC v. StokerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  5. Zarach v. Atlanta Claims Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. RCO LEGAL, P.S., INC. Et Al. v. JOHNSON.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  2. Neff v. McGee.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  3. Stoploss Specialists, LLC v. Vericlaim, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  4. American Civil Liberties Union, LLC v. B. Reid ZehCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
  5. BRENDAN BOLEY v. A-1 HORTON'S MOVING SERVICE, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API